Titel: Assessing sampling coverage of species distribution in biodiversity databases
Autor/-in: Sporbert, M.
Bruelheide, H.
Seidler, G.
Keil, P.
Jandt, U.
Austrheim, G.
Biurrun, I.
Campos, J.A.
Carni, A.
Chytry, M.
Csiky, J.
De Bie, E.
Dengler, Jürgen
et. al: Yes
Erschienen in: Journal of vegetation science
Band(Heft): 30
Heft: 4
Seiten: 620
Seiten bis: 632
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Wiley
Erscheinungsdatum: 20-Mai-2019
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Sprache: Englisch
Fachgebiet (DDC): 333: Bodenwirtschaft und Ressourcen
577: Ökologie
Zusammenfassung: Aim: Biodiversity databases are valuable resources for understanding plant species distributions and dynamics, but they may insufficiently represent the actual geographic distribution and climatic niches of species. Here we propose and test a method to assess sampling coverage of species distribution in biodiversity databases in geographic and climatic space. Location: Europe. Methods: Using a test selection of 808,794 vegetation plots from the European Vegetation Archive (EVA), we assessed the sampling coverage of 564 European vascular plant species across both their geographic ranges and realized climatic niches. Range maps from the Chorological Database Halle (CDH) were used as background reference data to capture species geographic ranges and to derive species climatic niches. To quantify sampling coverage, we developed a box‐counting method, the Dynamic Match Coefficient (DMC), which quantifies how much a set of occurrences of a given species matches with its geographic range or climatic niche. DMC is the area under the curve measuring the match between occurrence data and background reference (geographic range or climatic niche) across grids with variable resolution. High DMC values indicate good sampling coverage. We applied null models to compare observed DMC values with expectations from random distributions across species ranges and niches. Results: Comparisons with null models showed that, for most species, actual distributions within EVA are deviating from null model expectations and are more clumped than expected in both geographic and climatic space. Despite high interspecific variation, we found a positive relationship in DMC values between geographic and climatic space, but sampling coverage was in general more random across geographic space. Conclusion: Because DMC values are species‐specific and most biodiversity databases are clearly biased in terms of sampling coverage of species occurrences, we recommend using DMC values as covariates in macroecological models that use species as the observation unit.
Departement: Life Sciences und Facility Management
Organisationseinheit: Institut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12763
ISSN: 1654-1103
1100-9233
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/17168
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.