Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3414
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnzengruber, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorAlotaibi, Fayez-
dc.contributor.authorKaufmann, Lilian S.-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Adhideb-
dc.contributor.authorOswald, Martin R.-
dc.contributor.authorMaul, Julia-Tatjana-
dc.contributor.authorMeier Käppeli, Barbara Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Lars E.-
dc.contributor.authorBonmarin, Mathias-
dc.contributor.authorNavarini, Alexander A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-16T15:14:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-16T15:14:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1323-8930de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1440-1592de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/14450-
dc.descriptionIn Pressde_CH
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patch testing of contact allergens to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a traditional, useful tool. The most important decision is the distinction between allergic and irritant reactions, as this has direct implications on diagnosis and management. Our objective was to evaluate a new method of non-contact infrared reading of patch tests. Secondary objectives included a possible correlation between the intensity of the patch test reaction and temperature change. Methods: 420 positive reactions from patients were included in our study. An independent patch test reader assessed the positive reactions and classified them as allergic (of intensity + to +++) or irritant (IR). At the same time, a forward-looking infrared (FLIR) camera attachment for an iPhone was used to acquire infrared thermal images of the patch tests, and images were analyzed using the FLIR ONE app. Results: Allergic patch test reactions were characterized by temperature increases of 0.72 ± 0.67°C compared to surrounding skin. Irritant reactions only resulted in 0.17 ± 0.31 °C temperature increase. The mean temperature difference between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.0001) and therefore was used to predict the type of contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Thermography is a reliable and effective way to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherJapanese Society of Allergologyde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofAllergology Internationalde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectAllergic contact dermatitisde_CH
dc.subjectContact allergyde_CH
dc.subjectInfraredde_CH
dc.subjectIrritant contact dermatitisde_CH
dc.subjectPatch testingde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616: Innere Medizin und Krankheitende_CH
dc.titleThermography : high sensitivity and specificity diagnosing contact dermatitis in patch testingde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitute of Computational Physics (ICP)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3414-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.alit.2018.12.001de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid30598404de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue2de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume68de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in Collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1323893018301631-main.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.