Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4963
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Titel: Planning and performance in small groups : collective implementation intentions enhance group goal striving
Autor/-in: Thürmer, J. Lukas
Wieber, Frank
Gollwitzer, Peter M.
DOI: 10.21256/zhaw-4963
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00603
Erschienen in: Frontiers in Psychology
Band(Heft): 8
Heft: 603
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Frontiers Research Foundation
ISSN: 1664-1078
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Collective implementation intentions; Cooperation and interaction; Motivation; Physical persistence; Small group performance
Fachgebiet (DDC): 302: Soziale Interaktion
Zusammenfassung: There are two key motivators to perform well in a group: making a contribution that (a) is crucial for the group (indispensability) and that (b) the other group members recognize (identifiability). We argue that indispensability promotes setting collective ("We") goals whereas identifiability induces individual ("I") goals. Although both goals may enhance performance, they should align with different strategies. Whereas pursuing collective goals should involve more cooperation, pursuing individual goals should involve less cooperation. Two experiments support this reasoning and show that planning out collective goals with collective implementation intentions (cIIs or "We-plans") relies on cooperation but planning out individual goals with individual implementation intentions (IIs or "I-plans") does not. In Experiment 1, three-member groups first formed a collective or an individual goal and then performed a first round of a physical persistence task. Groups then either formed a respective implementation intention (cII or II) or a control plan and then performed a second round of the task. Although groups with cIIs and IIs performed better on a physical persistence task than respective control groups, only cII groups interacted more cooperatively during task performance. To confirm the causal role of these interaction processes, Experiment 2 used the same persistence task and manipulated whether groups could communicate: When communication was hindered, groups with cIIs but not groups with IIs performed worse. Communication thus qualifies as a process making cIIs effective. The present research offers a psychology of action account to small group performance.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/14257
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Departement: Gesundheit
Organisationseinheit: Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften (IGW)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Gesundheit

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
2017_Wieber_Planning_and_performance_in_small_groups.pdf441.39 kBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.