Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMock, Ralf Günter-
dc.contributor.authorBarth, Uli-
dc.contributor.authorFranz, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorBrunner, Sandro-
dc.contributor.authorLeksin, Alexey-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T07:58:08Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-29T07:58:08Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-62276-436-5de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13320-
dc.description.abstractRisk assessment audits are considered as service offers of consulting engineers. The employment of modern technology (e.g. web-based tools) affects audit methodology as well as the range of services. Besides extended data-handling and illustration facilities, changes that will move audit approaches from paper application and FMEA-like check lists to computer-aided and formalised algorithms require adaptability of engineering offices. The paper presents a risk audit methodology in the area of fire protection which bases on a joint R&D project of a Swiss engineering office (contractee) and Swiss and German universities (academia). It defines and discusses the terms in use (risk, hazard, and safety) as well as the field of application. In the latter, compliance check is confronted with risk optimisation. The contractee’s demand for generalisation, web-services, practicability as well as the respect of in-house realities necessitates the revision of the risk check approach in use. The contractee’s wealth of experience in risk audits needs to be re-utilised as fa as possible. A multi-attribute approach for specifying and weighting undesired events and consequences is introduced as damage is mostly attributed to personal damage, buildings, property, and  interruption in production or operations.For this, a Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is introduced in the academic problem-solving approach. A set of event trees is generated which covers the most important scenarios in the area of fire protection. These event trees are integrated in the multi-attribute approach. The methodology is further tailored towards a contractee’s problem solving approach which simplifies AHP. A literature research shows the current practise of AHP in the area of risk assessment as well as common computer models for fire and smoke associated with risk assessment. Pro and cons of the presented risk audit approach are discussed.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherIAPSAM & ESRAde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectRisikoanalysede_CH
dc.subjectAuditde_CH
dc.subjectFeuerde_CH
dc.subjectToolde_CH
dc.subject.ddc004: Informatikde_CH
dc.subject.ddc658.4: Leitendes Managementde_CH
dc.titleComputer-assisted risk assessment audit on operational levelde_CH
dc.typeKonferenz: Paperde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Angewandte Informationstechnologie (InIT)de_CH
zhaw.conference.details11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 (PSAM11 & ESREL 2012), Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June 2012de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end4102de_CH
zhaw.pages.start4093de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.title.proceedings11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012de_CH
Appears in Collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.