Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4903
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaumgartner, Franz-
dc.contributor.authorSchär, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorPezzotti, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHaller, J.-
dc.contributor.authorPolverini, D.-
dc.contributor.authorTzamalis, G.-
dc.contributor.authorZaaiman, W.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-27T18:05:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-27T18:05:28Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.isbn3-936338-27-2de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13312-
dc.description.abstractThe Swiss Mobile Flasher Bus (SMFB) is equipped with a standard high-quality flasher and a very high throughput of up to 200 PV modules per day could be reached direct at customer site. Recently an analysis of the SMFB’s measurement uncertainty budget was presented, resulted in an expanded combined uncertainty of ±3% at a 95% confidence level for standard crystalline Silicon modules. This uncertainty value is about 1% larger than values of the best stationary test labs but enables still very accurate measurements at ambient temperature conditions with the advantage to make more measurements directly on customer’s site. In this paper this uncertainty values were tested by intercomparison of measurement results of the SMFB and the stationary JRC ESTI laboratory on the same PV modules performed within the same hour to reduce uncertainty contributions by instability of the device under test DUT. The largest difference of nominal power measurements was found to be smaller 0.5% for polycrystalline standard modules including the precision measurement at Fraunhofer ISE on the same DUT performed 20 months before. Measurements on standard thin film CIS PV modules resulted in deviations up to 3.7% which are within the calculated SMFB overall uncertainty value of 4%. No light pre-conditioning was performed to the CIS modules and different flasher pulse length was used, 10ms for the SMFB and 1.2ms for the stationary laboratory flasher. In a second intercomparison run the spectral response measurement on module level of SMFB and the JRC ESTI was performed by the use of band pass filters of about 50nm width. The good correlation of the results show that the SMFB spectral response measurement is valuable to calculate the spectral mismatch factor to account for different spectral characteristics of measured PV module, the used monitor cell and the flashers spectra to optimise the overall measurement uncertainty of the SMFB.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherWIPde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc621.3: Elektro-, Kommunikations-, Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnikde_CH
dc.titleIntercomparison of pulsed solar simulator measurements between the mobile flasher bus and stationary calibration laboratoriesde_CH
dc.typeKonferenz: Paperde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Energiesysteme und Fluid-Engineering (IEFE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-4903-
dc.identifier.doi10.4229/26thEUPVSEC2011-4AV.1.27de_CH
zhaw.conference.details26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC), Hamburg, Germany, 5-9 September 2011de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end3377de_CH
zhaw.pages.start3374de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewNot specifiedde_CH
zhaw.title.proceedingsProceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSECde_CH
zhaw.webfeedPhotovoltaikde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2011_Baumgartner_Intercomparison_of_pulsed_solar_simulator_measurements.pdf651.65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Baumgartner, F., Schär, D., Pezzotti, M., Haller, J., Polverini, D., Tzamalis, G., & Zaaiman, W. (2011). Intercomparison of pulsed solar simulator measurements between the mobile flasher bus and stationary calibration laboratories [Conference paper]. Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC, 3374–3377. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4903
Baumgartner, F. et al. (2011) ‘Intercomparison of pulsed solar simulator measurements between the mobile flasher bus and stationary calibration laboratories’, in Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC. WIP, pp. 3374–3377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4903.
F. Baumgartner et al., “Intercomparison of pulsed solar simulator measurements between the mobile flasher bus and stationary calibration laboratories,” in Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC, 2011, pp. 3374–3377. doi: 10.21256/zhaw-4903.
BAUMGARTNER, Franz, Daniel SCHÄR, M. PEZZOTTI, J. HALLER, D. POLVERINI, G. TZAMALIS und W. ZAAIMAN, 2011. Intercomparison of pulsed solar simulator measurements between the mobile flasher bus and stationary calibration laboratories. In: Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC. Conference paper. WIP. 2011. S. 3374–3377. ISBN 3-936338-27-2
Baumgartner, Franz, Daniel Schär, M. Pezzotti, J. Haller, D. Polverini, G. Tzamalis, and W. Zaaiman. 2011. “Intercomparison of Pulsed Solar Simulator Measurements between the Mobile Flasher Bus and Stationary Calibration Laboratories.” Conference paper. In Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC, 3374–77. WIP. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4903.
Baumgartner, Franz, et al. “Intercomparison of Pulsed Solar Simulator Measurements between the Mobile Flasher Bus and Stationary Calibration Laboratories.” Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition EUPVSEC, WIP, 2011, pp. 3374–77, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4903.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.