| Publication type: | Conference paper |
| Type of review: | Peer review (publication) |
| Title: | Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating physical effects of hazardous substances |
| Authors: | Leksin, Alexey Barth, Uli Adelulov, D. Mock, Ralf Günter |
| Proceedings: | Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems : ESREL 2015 |
| Page(s): | 69 |
| Pages to: | 78 |
| Conference details: | 25th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2015), Zurich, 7-10 September 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015 |
| Publisher / Ed. Institution: | Taylor & Francis |
| ISBN: | 978-1-138-02879-1 978-1-315-64841-5 |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | Standards; Brandschutz; Risiko |
| Subject (DDC): | 363: Environmental and security problems |
| Abstract: | Methods to calculate effects of the accidental release of hazardous chemicals are documented in various national technical standards, guidelines and other bodies of laws. However, these standards differ in methodological concepts, resources needed and tool support. This may leave room for inconsistencies concerning results and subsequently risks figures. Although these differences complicate the point-by-point comparison of results the set of methodologies offer alternatives to scientists and practitioners when looking for most applicable approaches and potential for optimization in methodology and tool development. The comparison, bases on the compilation of standards of two different legislative bodies: the Russian “Method to define the computed value of fire risks in industrial facilities”, implemented into a MS EXCEL prototype tool, and the TNO EFFECTS framework and tool. In order to elaborate the variation effects on the computational results, three flammable substances are considered and recalculated by a case study. The paper concludes that on one side the comparison of both tools is similar for some scenarios, also compared with the case studies and on the other hand scenarios exists, which have different heat flux, and gives a motivation to research the real pool fires and compare these with the existing tools. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13263 |
| Fulltext version: | Published version |
| License (according to publishing contract): | Licence according to publishing contract |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisational Unit: | Institute of Sustainable Development (INE) |
| Appears in collections: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Leksin, A., Barth, U., Adelulov, D., & Mock, R. G. (2015). Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating physical effects of hazardous substances [Conference paper]. Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems : ESREL 2015, 69–78.
Leksin, A. et al. (2015) ‘Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating physical effects of hazardous substances’, in Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems : ESREL 2015. Taylor & Francis, pp. 69–78.
A. Leksin, U. Barth, D. Adelulov, and R. G. Mock, “Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating physical effects of hazardous substances,” in Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems : ESREL 2015, 2015, pp. 69–78.
LEKSIN, Alexey, Uli BARTH, D. ADELULOV und Ralf Günter MOCK, 2015. Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating physical effects of hazardous substances. In: Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems : ESREL 2015. Conference paper. Taylor & Francis. 2015. S. 69–78. ISBN 978-1-138-02879-1
Leksin, Alexey, Uli Barth, D. Adelulov, and Ralf Günter Mock. 2015. “Comparison of Dutch and Russian Standards for Calculating Physical Effects of Hazardous Substances.” Conference paper. In Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems : ESREL 2015, 69–78. Taylor & Francis.
Leksin, Alexey, et al. “Comparison of Dutch and Russian Standards for Calculating Physical Effects of Hazardous Substances.” Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems : ESREL 2015, Taylor & Francis, 2015, pp. 69–78.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.