Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4856
Titel: Exercise and other non-pharmaceutical interventions for cancer-related fatigue in patients during or after cancer treatment : a systematic review incorporating an indirect-comparisons meta-analysis
Autor/-in: Hilfiker, Roger
Meichtry, Andre
Eicher, Manuela
Nilsson Balfe, Lina
Knols, Ruud H.
Verra, Martin L.
Taeymans, Jan
Erschienen in: BJSM
Band(Heft): 52
Heft: 10
Seiten: 651
Seiten bis: 658
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: BMJ Publishing Group
Erscheinungsdatum: Mai-2018
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY-NC 4.0: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Cancer related fatigue; Exercise; Indirect comparison meta-analysis.; Network meta-analysis; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Cognitive Therapy; Fatigue; Massage; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Relaxation Therapy; Resistance Training; Tai Ji; Yoga; Exercise Therapy
Fachgebiet (DDC): 615: Pharmakologie und Therapeutik
616: Innere Medizin und Krankheiten
Zusammenfassung: Aim: To assess the relative effects of different types of exercise and other non-pharmaceutical interventions on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients during and after cancer treatment. Design: Systematic review and indirect-comparisons meta-analysis. Data sources: Articles were searched in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and published meta-analyses. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised studies published up to January 2017 evaluating different types of exercise or other non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce CRF in any cancer type during or after treatment. Study appraisal and synthesis: Risk of bias assessment with PEDro criteria and random effects Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results: We included 245 studies. Comparing the treatments with usual care during cancer treatment, relaxation exercise was the highest ranked intervention with a standardisedmean difference (SMD) of −0.77 (95% Credible Interval (CrI) −1.22 to −0.31), while massage (−0.78; −1.55 to −0.01), cognitive–behavioural therapy combined with physical activity (combined CBT, −0.72; −1.34 to −0.09), combined aerobic and resistance training (−0.67; −1.01 to −0.34), resistance training (−0.53; −1.02 to −0.03), aerobic (−0.53; −0.80 to −0.26) and yoga (−0.51; −1.01 to 0.00) all had moderate-to-large SMDs. After cancer treatment, yoga showed the highest effect (−0.68; −0.93 to −0.43). Combined aerobic and resistance training (−0.50; −0.66 to −0.34), combined CBT (−0.45; −0.70 to −0.21), Tai-Chi (−0.45; −0.84 to −0.06), CBT (−0.42; −0.58 to −0.25), resistance training (−0.35; −0.62 to −0.08) and aerobic (−0.33; −0.51 to −0.16) showed all small-to-moderate SMDs. Conclusions: Patients can choose among different effective types of exercise and non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce CRF.
Departement: Gesundheit
Organisationseinheit: Institut für Physiotherapie (IPT)
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
DOI: 10.21256/zhaw-4856
10.1136/bjsports-2016-096422
ISSN: 0306-3674
1473-0480
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/12320
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Gesundheit

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
2018_Hilfiker_Exercise_and_other_non_pharmaceutical_interventions.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.