Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSattelmayer, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorHilfiker, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorLuomajoki, Hannu-
dc.contributor.authorElsig, Simone-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-16T10:03:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-16T10:03:36Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2468-7812de_CH
dc.identifier.issn2468-8630de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/1200-
dc.descriptionIn pressde_CH
dc.description.abstractBackground: Movement control abilities are often reduced in persons with neck pain. In physiotherapeutic practice observational tests are frequently used to assess the impaired abilities. Several tests for movement control abilities are available, but no evidence exists on how to combine and interpret them. Objective: The aim was to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests with Rasch analysis. Design: Cross-sectional study Methods: Thirty persons with and thirty without neck pain were recruited for this study. All persons performed ten movement control tests. A partial credit model was applied to investigate item fit, ordering of the item response functions, dimensionality and hierarchy of the tests. Results: The majority of persons with neck pain had moderate disabilities and the mean value in the Neck disability index was 10.7. Functioning of the movement control tests to measure the construct “movement control abilities” was adequate for the majority of tests. Three movement control test showed considerable misfit. Possible explanations were a reactive movement control instead of an active control and a more challenging test position. Test difficulties and person abilities could be estimated for the complete sample. The most difficult test was “sitting rocking forward” (1.13 logits) and the least difficult test was “lifting the right arm” (-1.30 logits). The highest person ability estimate was 3.61 logits indicating that movement control tests are missing to evaluate persons with moderate neck disabilities. Conclusion: Modifying the existing set of tests is required to evaluate the complete spectrum of persons with neck pain.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofMusculoskeletal Science and Practicede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.82: Physiotherapiede_CH
dc.titleUse of Rasch analysis to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests for the neckde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Physiotherapie (IPT)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-1202-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.math.2016.07.006de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume27de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2017-07-21de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sattelmeier et al 2016.pdfAccepted Version451.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Sattelmayer, M., Hilfiker, R., Luomajoki, H., & Elsig, S. (2016). Use of Rasch analysis to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests for the neck. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 27. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1202
Sattelmayer, M. et al. (2016) ‘Use of Rasch analysis to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests for the neck’, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1202.
M. Sattelmayer, R. Hilfiker, H. Luomajoki, and S. Elsig, “Use of Rasch analysis to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests for the neck,” Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, vol. 27, 2016, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-1202.
SATTELMAYER, Martin, Roger HILFIKER, Hannu LUOMAJOKI und Simone ELSIG, 2016. Use of Rasch analysis to investigate structural validity of a set of movement control tests for the neck. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2016. Bd. 27. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-1202
Sattelmayer, Martin, Roger Hilfiker, Hannu Luomajoki, and Simone Elsig. 2016. “Use of Rasch Analysis to Investigate Structural Validity of a Set of Movement Control Tests for the Neck.” Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 27. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1202.
Sattelmayer, Martin, et al. “Use of Rasch Analysis to Investigate Structural Validity of a Set of Movement Control Tests for the Neck.” Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, vol. 27, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1202.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.