Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Parameter-free aggregation of value functions from multiple experts and uncertainty assessment in multi-criteria evaluation
Authors : Rohrbach, Benjamin
Weibel, Robert
Laube, Patrick
Published in : Journal of Spatial Information Science
Volume(Issue) : 2018
Issue : 16
Pages : 27
Pages to: 51
Publisher / Ed. Institution : University of Maine
Issue Date: 2018
License (according to publishing contract) : CC BY 3.0: Attribution 3.0 Unported
Type of review: Peer review (Publication)
Language : English
Subjects : Multi-criteria evaluation; Participatory mapping; Land-use
Subject (DDC) : 333.7: Land, recreational areas and energy
Abstract: This paper makes a threefold contribution to spatial multi-criteria evaluation (MCE): firstly by presenting a new method concerning value functions, secondly by comparing different approaches to assess the uncertainty of a MCE outcome, and thirdly by presenting a case-study on land-use change. Even though MCE is a well-known methodology in GIScience, there is a lack of practicable approaches to incorporate the potentially diverse views of multiple experts in defining and standardizing the values used to implement input criteria. We propose a new method that allows generating and aggregating non-monotonic value functions, integrating the views of multiple experts. The new approach only requires the experts to provide up to four values, making it easy to be included in questionnaires. We applied the proposed method in a case study that uses MCE to assess the potential of future loss of vineyards in a wine-growing area in Switzerland, involving 13 experts from research, consultancy, government, and practice. To assess the uncertainty of the outcome three different approaches were used: firstly, a complete Monte Carlo simulation with the bootstrapped inputs, secondly a one-factor-at-a-time variation, and thirdly bootstrapping of the 13 inputs with subsequent analytical error propagation. The complete Monte Carlo simulation has shown the most detailed distribution of the uncertainty. However, all three methods indicate a general trend of areas with lower likelihood of future cultivation to show a higher degree of relative uncertainty.
Departement: Life Sciences and Facility Management
Organisational Unit: Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR)
Publication type: Article in scientific Journal
DOI : 10.5311/JOSIS.2018.16.368
ISSN: 1948-660X
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
368-1094-7-PB.pdf2.28 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.