Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-23054
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Titel: Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial
Autor/-in: Thijs, Liselot
Voets, Eline
Wiskerke, Evelien
Nauwelaerts, Thomas
Arys, Yves
Haspeslagh, Harold
Kool, Jan
Bischof, Patrick
Bauer, Christoph
Lemmens, Robin
Baumgartner, Daniel
Verheyden, Geert
et. al: No
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7
10.21256/zhaw-23054
Erschienen in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Band(Heft): 18
Heft: 120
Erscheinungsdatum: 28-Jul-2021
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: BioMed Central
ISSN: 1743-0003
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Stroke; Technology-supported; Sitting balance; Trunk rehabilitation; Randomized controlled trial; Feasibility
Fachgebiet (DDC): 615.82: Physiotherapie
616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystems
Zusammenfassung: Background: Technology development for sitting balance therapy and trunk rehabilitation is scarce. Hence, intensive one-to-one therapist-patient training is still required. We have developed a novel rehabilitation prototype, specifically aimed at providing sitting balance therapy. We investigated whether technology-supported sitting balance training was feasible and safe in chronic stroke patients and we determined whether clinical outcomes improved after a four-week programme, compared with usual care. Methods: In this parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled pilot trial, we divided first-event chronic stroke participants into two groups. The experimental group received usual care plus additional therapy supported by rehabilitation technology, consisting of 12 sessions of 50 min of therapy over four weeks. The control group received usual care only. We assessed all participants twice pre-intervention and once post-intervention. Feasibility and safety were descriptively analysed. Between-group analysis evaluated the pre-to-post differences in changes in motor and functional outcomes. Results: In total, 30 participants were recruited and 29 completed the trial (experimental group: n = 14; control group: n = 15). There were no between-group differences at baseline. Therapy was evaluated as feasible by participants and therapist. There were no serious adverse events during sitting balance therapy. Changes in clinical outcomes from pre- to post-intervention demonstrated increases in the experimental than in the control group for: sitting balance and trunk function, evaluated by the Trunk Impairment Scale (mean points score (SD) 7.07 (1.69) versus 0.33 (2.35); p < 0.000); maximum gait speed, assessed with the 10 Metre Walk Test (mean gait speed 0.16 (0.16) m/s versus 0.06 (0.06) m/s; p = 0.003); and functional balance, measured using the Berg balance scale (median points score (IQR) 4.5 (5) versus 0 (4); p = 0.014). Conclusions: Technology-supported sitting balance training in persons with chronic stroke is feasible and safe. A four-week, 12-session programme on top of usual care suggests beneficial effects for trunk function, maximum gait speed and functional balance.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23054
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Departement: Gesundheit
School of Engineering
Organisationseinheit: Institut für Mechanische Systeme (IMES)
Institut für Physiotherapie (IPT)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Gesundheit
Publikationen School of Engineering

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
2021_Thijs-etal_Technology-supported-sitting-balance-therapy.pdf1.67 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Langanzeige
Thijs, L., Voets, E., Wiskerke, E., Nauwelaerts, T., Arys, Y., Haspeslagh, H., Kool, J., Bischof, P., Bauer, C., Lemmens, R., Baumgartner, D., & Verheyden, G. (2021). Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(120). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7
Thijs, L. et al. (2021) ‘Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial’, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(120). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7.
L. Thijs et al., “Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 120, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7.
THIJS, Liselot, Eline VOETS, Evelien WISKERKE, Thomas NAUWELAERTS, Yves ARYS, Harold HASPESLAGH, Jan KOOL, Patrick BISCHOF, Christoph BAUER, Robin LEMMENS, Daniel BAUMGARTNER und Geert VERHEYDEN, 2021. Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 28 Juli 2021. Bd. 18, Nr. 120. DOI 10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7
Thijs, Liselot, Eline Voets, Evelien Wiskerke, Thomas Nauwelaerts, Yves Arys, Harold Haspeslagh, Jan Kool, et al. 2021. “Technology-Supported Sitting Balance Therapy versus Usual Care in the Chronic Stage after Stroke : A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 18 (120). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7.
Thijs, Liselot, et al. “Technology-Supported Sitting Balance Therapy versus Usual Care in the Chronic Stage after Stroke : A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 120, July 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.