Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-18369| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study |
| Autor/-in: | Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca |
| et. al: | No |
| DOI: | 10.1002/nop2.383 10.21256/zhaw-18369 |
| Erschienen in: | Nursing Open |
| Band(Heft): | 7 |
| Heft: | 1 |
| Seite(n): | 212 |
| Seiten bis: | 224 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | Sep-2019 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Wiley |
| ISSN: | 2054-1058 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 610.73: Pflege |
| Zusammenfassung: | Aims: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. Design: Embedded mixed‐methods design. Methods: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1-month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. Results: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/18369 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisationseinheit: | Institut für Datenanalyse und Prozessdesign (IDP) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huber_et_al-2019-Nursing_Open.pdf | 905.72 kB | Adobe PDF |  Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Huber, E., Kleinknecht‐Dolf, M., Kugler, C., Müller, M., & Spirig, R. (2019). Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study. Nursing Open, 7(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383
Huber, E. et al. (2019) ‘Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study’, Nursing Open, 7(1), pp. 212–224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
E. Huber, M. Kleinknecht‐Dolf, C. Kugler, M. Müller, and R. Spirig, “Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study,” Nursing Open, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 212–224, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1002/nop2.383.
HUBER, Evelyn, Michael KLEINKNECHT‐DOLF, Christiane KUGLER, Marianne MÜLLER und Rebecca SPIRIG, 2019. Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study. Nursing Open. September 2019. Bd. 7, Nr. 1, S. 212–224. DOI 10.1002/nop2.383
Huber, Evelyn, Michael Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Christiane Kugler, Marianne Müller, and Rebecca Spirig. 2019. “Validation of the Instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : A Mixed‐Methods Study.” Nursing Open 7 (1): 212–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
Huber, Evelyn, et al. “Validation of the Instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : A Mixed‐Methods Study.” Nursing Open, vol. 7, no. 1, Sept. 2019, pp. 212–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.