Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTempl, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorMozes, Edina-
dc.contributor.authorTempl, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorFöldesi, Rita-
dc.contributor.authorSzirák, Ádám-
dc.contributor.authorBáldi, András-
dc.contributor.authorKovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-04T10:35:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-04T10:35:34Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2299-4831de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/17406-
dc.description.abstractBees are the most important group of flower visitors providing an essential ecosystem service, namely pollination. Due to the worldwide decline of bees, there should be standardized sampling methods in place to ensure consistent and comparable results between studies. We compared the two commonly used sampling methods of yellow pan traps and transect walk to determine (i) which habitat variables affect the species composition, abundance and species richness of sampled bee communities, (ii) which method potentially contains sampling bias towards some individuals or groups of bees and (iii) the efficiency of sampling in various habitats. We conducted fieldwork in different agricultural habitats distributed along landscape heterogeneity and topography gradients. Our results showed that the height of vegetation, the average number of flowers and the amount of woody vegetation had the greatest influence on the sampling efficiency. Our survey also demonstrated that sampling by transect walk captured less bees in general, especially in stubble, maize, and cereal fields. We found that Apis mellifera and Bombus spp. were well represented in samples collected by the transect walk method, while the abundance of other genera, especially Dasypoda, Hylaeus and Panurgus was higher in pan traps. Based on the results, we suggest (i) the transect walk method to compare samples of flower-visiting wild bee communities from various habitats of different vegetation and flower characteristics, (ii) application of the transect walk or pan traps to compare similar habitats and (iii) adoption of a comprehensive method which would incorporate both sampling techniques to gain a more complex insight into wild bee species composition.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherApicultural Research Associationde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Apicultural Sciencede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectBee surveyde_CH
dc.subjectInsect pollinatorde_CH
dc.subjectRedundancy analysisde_CH
dc.subjectSampling biasde_CH
dc.subjectTransformation-basedde_CH
dc.subjectWild beede_CH
dc.subject.ddc590: Tiere (Zoologie)de_CH
dc.titleHabitat-dependency of transect walk and pan trap methods for bee sampling in farmlandsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Datenanalyse und Prozessdesign (IDP)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3192-
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/JAS-2019-0014de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end115de_CH
zhaw.pages.start93de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume63de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedStatistik und Quantitative Financede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Show simple item record
Templ, B., Mozes, E., Templ, M., Földesi, R., Szirák, Á., Báldi, A., & Kovács-Hostyánszki, A. (2019). Habitat-dependency of transect walk and pan trap methods for bee sampling in farmlands. Journal of Apicultural Science, 63(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3192
Templ, B. et al. (2019) ‘Habitat-dependency of transect walk and pan trap methods for bee sampling in farmlands’, Journal of Apicultural Science, 63(1), pp. 93–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3192.
B. Templ et al., “Habitat-dependency of transect walk and pan trap methods for bee sampling in farmlands,” Journal of Apicultural Science, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 93–115, 2019, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3192.
TEMPL, Barbara, Edina MOZES, Matthias TEMPL, Rita FÖLDESI, Ádám SZIRÁK, András BÁLDI und Anikó KOVÁCS-HOSTYÁNSZKI, 2019. Habitat-dependency of transect walk and pan trap methods for bee sampling in farmlands. Journal of Apicultural Science. 2019. Bd. 63, Nr. 1, S. 93–115. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3192
Templ, Barbara, Edina Mozes, Matthias Templ, Rita Földesi, Ádám Szirák, András Báldi, and Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki. 2019. “Habitat-Dependency of Transect Walk and Pan Trap Methods for Bee Sampling in Farmlands.” Journal of Apicultural Science 63 (1): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3192.
Templ, Barbara, et al. “Habitat-Dependency of Transect Walk and Pan Trap Methods for Bee Sampling in Farmlands.” Journal of Apicultural Science, vol. 63, no. 1, 2019, pp. 93–115, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3192.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.