Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSauter-Servaes, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorKrautscheid, Thomas-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T09:23:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-20T09:23:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0373-5346de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/14049-
dc.description.abstractTrain travel in Europe, in the public’s view, suffers from extraordinarily high fares. This contrasts strongly with air travel, where liberalisation of the European passenger aviation market has led to cut-throat price competition on many domestic and international routes. As a result, the airlines offer extremely low fares that are heavily promoted and advertised. Despite the fact that only small numbers of tickets are available at these low prices, these airline marketing activities have had a strong influence on the public perception of inter-city rail fares. The airlines’ advertised starting prices have become an important reference point for consumers’ price assessments of competing travel modes, and the assumed price advantage of air travel affects their booking behaviour. Expecting to find the best travel prices at airlines, consumers tend to narrow their search to online flight-booking engines such as Kayak, ebookers and eDreams. As most of these online tools do not offer any price comparison between modes, the majority of travellers do not even bother to check rail fares. To make matters worse, travellers usually compare the journey times of air and rail without taking into account the additional access and processing times at airports — which is likely to increase further as a result of recent events. This is the background to a 2014-15 study commissioned by the International Union of Railways entitled European Air-Rail-Bus Price Comparison. The purpose of this study was to review current ticket prices for rail, air and coach travel on selected domestic and cross-border routes, where air and rail are comparable thanks to similar overall travel times. Do travellers really obtain the best price by going with a so-called low-cost airline? Or could they save significant amounts of money by choosing rail over air?de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherIPC Transport Pressde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofRailway Gazette Internationalde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectLuftverkehrde_CH
dc.subjectSchienenverkehrde_CH
dc.subjectPreisvergleichde_CH
dc.subject.ddc380: Verkehrde_CH
dc.titleRail beats air in European fare comparisonde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in Magazin oder Zeitungde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE)de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end51de_CH
zhaw.pages.start49de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume172de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Sauter-Servaes, T., & Krautscheid, T. (2016). Rail beats air in European fare comparison. Railway Gazette International, 172(1), 49–51.
Sauter-Servaes, T. and Krautscheid, T. (2016) ‘Rail beats air in European fare comparison’, Railway Gazette International, 172(1), pp. 49–51.
T. Sauter-Servaes and T. Krautscheid, “Rail beats air in European fare comparison,” Railway Gazette International, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 49–51, 2016.
SAUTER-SERVAES, Thomas und Thomas KRAUTSCHEID, 2016. Rail beats air in European fare comparison. Railway Gazette International. 2016. Bd. 172, Nr. 1, S. 49–51
Sauter-Servaes, Thomas, and Thomas Krautscheid. 2016. “Rail Beats Air in European Fare Comparison.” Railway Gazette International 172 (1): 49–51.
Sauter-Servaes, Thomas, and Thomas Krautscheid. “Rail Beats Air in European Fare Comparison.” Railway Gazette International, vol. 172, no. 1, 2016, pp. 49–51.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.