Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKehl, Konstantin-
dc.contributor.authorThen, Volker-
dc.contributor.authorKrlev, Gorgi-
dc.contributor.authorMildenberger, Georg-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T10:27:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-30T10:27:55Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13415-
dc.description.abstractThe Social Return on Investment (SROI) attempts to measure socio-economic returns by linking positive value created for society to costs avoided because of an intervention. In principle SROI is an appropriate and distinguished instrument of performance and sustainability measurement for a whole range of social purpose organisations. However, an oversimplified interpretation of impact tends to produce substantial comparability and legitimacy problems. In this article we show how the capabilities as well as the deficiencies could be addressed by promoting an integrated version of SROI. The latter can not only help assess individual initiatives, but also conceptualise and fathom the impact of large service providers (networks) located in developed welfare regimes.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherRoutledgede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofMeasuring and controlling sustainability : spanning theory and practicede_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc330: Wirtschaftde_CH
dc.subject.ddc658.4: Leitendes Managementde_CH
dc.titleAdapting the measuring rod for social returns in advanced welfare states: A critique of SROIde_CH
dc.typeBuchbeitragde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSoziale Arbeitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Sozialmanagement (ISM)de_CH
zhaw.publisher.placeLondonde_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.parentwork.editorLindgreen, Adam-
zhaw.parentwork.editorHirsch, Bernhard-
zhaw.parentwork.editorVallaster, Christine-
zhaw.parentwork.editorYousafzai, Shumaila-
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewEditorial reviewde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Soziale Arbeit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Kehl, K., Then, V., Krlev, G., & Mildenberger, G. (2018). Adapting the measuring rod for social returns in advanced welfare states: A critique of SROI. In A. Lindgreen, B. Hirsch, C. Vallaster, & S. Yousafzai (Eds.), Measuring and controlling sustainability : spanning theory and practice. Routledge.
Kehl, K. et al. (2018) ‘Adapting the measuring rod for social returns in advanced welfare states: A critique of SROI’, in A. Lindgreen et al. (eds) Measuring and controlling sustainability : spanning theory and practice. London: Routledge.
K. Kehl, V. Then, G. Krlev, and G. Mildenberger, “Adapting the measuring rod for social returns in advanced welfare states: A critique of SROI,” in Measuring and controlling sustainability : spanning theory and practice, A. Lindgreen, B. Hirsch, C. Vallaster, and S. Yousafzai, Eds. London: Routledge, 2018.
KEHL, Konstantin, Volker THEN, Gorgi KRLEV und Georg MILDENBERGER, 2018. Adapting the measuring rod for social returns in advanced welfare states: A critique of SROI. In: Adam LINDGREEN, Bernhard HIRSCH, Christine VALLASTER und Shumaila YOUSAFZAI (Hrsg.), Measuring and controlling sustainability : spanning theory and practice. London: Routledge
Kehl, Konstantin, Volker Then, Gorgi Krlev, and Georg Mildenberger. 2018. “Adapting the Measuring Rod for Social Returns in Advanced Welfare States: A Critique of SROI.” In Measuring and Controlling Sustainability : Spanning Theory and Practice, edited by Adam Lindgreen, Bernhard Hirsch, Christine Vallaster, and Shumaila Yousafzai. London: Routledge.
Kehl, Konstantin, et al. “Adapting the Measuring Rod for Social Returns in Advanced Welfare States: A Critique of SROI.” Measuring and Controlling Sustainability : Spanning Theory and Practice, edited by Adam Lindgreen et al., Routledge, 2018.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.