Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4914| Publikationstyp: | Konferenz: Paper |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Tool qualification considerations for tools supporting STPA |
| Autor/-in: | Krauss, Sven Stefan Rejzek, Martin Hilbes, Christian |
| DOI: | 10.21256/zhaw-4914 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.500 |
| Erschienen in: | Procedia Engineering |
| Band(Heft): | 128 |
| Seite(n): | 15 |
| Seiten bis: | 24 |
| Angaben zur Konferenz: | 3rd European STAMP Workshop, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4-6 October 2015 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2015 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 1877-7058 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: | System-Theoretic Process Analysis; Dependable software; SAHRA; Multi domain tool qualification; Tool validation; Toolchain analysis; Cyber physical systems; Offline support tools |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 005: Computerprogrammierung, Programme und Daten |
| Zusammenfassung: | We evaluated tool qualification requirements for hazard and risk analysis software tools, particularly for tools supporting System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), and compared the tool qualification approaches of safety standards IEC 61508, EN 50128, DO-178C/DO-330 and ISO 26262. Our software tool SAHRA integrates STPA in an existing engineering toolchain by providing an extension for the UML/SysML modeling tool Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. We found that the qualification of this tool according to the mentioned safety standards was not straightforward and required further analysis. Therefore, we analyzed the tool risks and found that those depend on many factors such as process risks, risks from tool errors, tool integration risks and operational scenarios regarding the use of the tool in the development lifecycle. We selected four operational scenarios for tools supporting STPA to evaluate tool qualification requirements. After concluding that a tool qualification is required, we used a multi-domain tool qualification development lifecycle guided by DO-330 for SAHRA. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13412 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisationseinheit: | Institut für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik (IAMP) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015_Krauss_Tool_qualification_considerations_for_tools_supporting_STPA.pdf | 747.49 kB | Adobe PDF |  Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Krauss, S. S., Rejzek, M., & Hilbes, C. (2015). Tool qualification considerations for tools supporting STPA [Conference paper]. Procedia Engineering, 128, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4914
Krauss, S.S., Rejzek, M. and Hilbes, C. (2015) ‘Tool qualification considerations for tools supporting STPA’, in Procedia Engineering. Elsevier, pp. 15–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4914.
S. S. Krauss, M. Rejzek, and C. Hilbes, “Tool qualification considerations for tools supporting STPA,” in Procedia Engineering, 2015, vol. 128, pp. 15–24. doi: 10.21256/zhaw-4914.
KRAUSS, Sven Stefan, Martin REJZEK und Christian HILBES, 2015. Tool qualification considerations for tools supporting STPA. In: Procedia Engineering. Conference paper. Elsevier. 2015. S. 15–24
Krauss, Sven Stefan, Martin Rejzek, and Christian Hilbes. 2015. “Tool Qualification Considerations for Tools Supporting STPA.” Conference paper. In Procedia Engineering, 128:15–24. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4914.
Krauss, Sven Stefan, et al. “Tool Qualification Considerations for Tools Supporting STPA.” Procedia Engineering, vol. 128, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 15–24, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4914.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.